
EPYC 7302

Xeon Gold 6240R
EPYC 7302 vs Xeon Gold 6240R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7302 vs Xeon Gold 6240R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7302 vs Xeon Gold 6240R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7302
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,466 less on MSRP ($978 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 151.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.3 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 165W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6240R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,500 vs 22,500).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6240R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($2,444 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6240R better than EPYC 7302?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7302 vs Xeon Gold 6240R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7302
The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

Xeon Gold 6240R
The Xeon Gold 6240R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,353 points. Launch price was $2,200.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240R — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Xeon Gold 6240R's 33,353 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7302. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 22,500 (14.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,192 vs 1,212, a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6240R that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,254 vs 17,218 (50.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240R.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+25% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+12% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 24 MB+4700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 33,499 | 33,353 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500 | 22,500+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,192 | 1,212+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,254 | 17,218+68% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6240R — the EPYC 7302 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6240R). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6240R) — the EPYC 7302 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6240R).
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+9% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+300% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6240R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6240R). Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, Xeon Gold 6240R targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Xeon Gold 6240R rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Server / Multi-thread Workstation | Server / High-load computing |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7302 was priced at $978, while the Xeon Gold 6240R came in at $2444. On launch pricing ($978 vs $2444), EPYC 7302 was $1466 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7302 delivers 34.3 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6240R — making the EPYC 7302 the 86% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $978-60% | $2444 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.3+152% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















