EPYC 7302 vs Xeon Gold 6240R

AMD

EPYC 7302

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6240R

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 4 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 7302 vs Xeon Gold 6240R Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7302 vs Xeon Gold 6240R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7302 vs Xeon Gold 6240R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7302

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,466 less on MSRP ($978 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
  • Delivers 151.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.3 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
  • Draws 155W instead of 165W, a 10W reduction.
  • 166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6240R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,500 vs 22,500).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6240R

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($2,444 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6240R better than EPYC 7302?
Yes. Xeon Gold 6240R is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 15.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6240R is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6240R is the stronger fit. You are getting 15.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6240R is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7302 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6240R comes in 149.9% more expensive on MSRP at $2,444 MSRP versus $978 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7302 is also 151.0% better value on MSRP (34.3 vs 13.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6240R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019), more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7302 vs Xeon Gold 6240R Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7302

The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6240R

The Xeon Gold 6240R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,353 points. Launch price was $2,200.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240R — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Xeon Gold 6240R's 33,353 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7302. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 22,500 (14.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,192 vs 1,212, a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6240R that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,254 vs 17,218 (50.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240R.

FeatureEPYC 7302Xeon Gold 6240R
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
4 GHz+21%
Base Clock
3 GHz+25%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
35.75 MB+12%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
24 MB+4700%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
33,499
33,353
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,500
22,500+15%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,192
1,212+2%
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,254
17,218+68%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6240R — the EPYC 7302 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6240R). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6240R) — the EPYC 7302 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6240R).

FeatureEPYC 7302Xeon Gold 6240R
Socket
SP3
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200+9%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+300%
1024 GB
RAM Channels
8+33%
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+167%
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6240R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6240R). Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, Xeon Gold 6240R targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Xeon Gold 6240R rivals EPYC 7402.

FeatureEPYC 7302Xeon Gold 6240R
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server / Multi-thread Workstation
Server / High-load computing
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7302 was priced at $978, while the Xeon Gold 6240R came in at $2444. On launch pricing ($978 vs $2444), EPYC 7302 was $1466 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7302 delivers 34.3 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6240R — making the EPYC 7302 the 86% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7302Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP
$978-60%
$2444
Performance per Dollar
34.3+152%
13.6
Release Date
2019
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.