EPYC 7302 vs Xeon D-2799

EPYC 7302 vs Xeon D-2799 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7302

16 / 32

33,499

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon D-2799

20 / 40

33,792

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7302 vs Xeon D-2799 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7302 vs Xeon D-2799: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7302

2019

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,192 vs 1,959).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,500 vs 20,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $978 MSRP, while Xeon D-2799 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌20.2% higher power demand at 155W vs 129W.

Xeon D-2799

2022

Why buy it

✅+64.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 129W instead of 155W, a 26W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-2799 better than EPYC 7302?

Yes. Xeon D-2799 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 0.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon D-2799 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2799 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-2799 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7302 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon D-2799 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $978 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7302 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2799 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7302 vs Xeon D-2799 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7302

The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

Xeon D-2799

The Xeon D-2799 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 129 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 33,792 points. Launch price was $1,972.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon D-2799 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2799 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon D-2799 — a 3% clock advantage for the Xeon D-2799 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon D-2799 uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Xeon D-2799's 33,792 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon D-2799. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 20,000 (2.5% advantage for the Xeon D-2799). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,192 vs 1,959, a 48.7% lead for the Xeon D-2799 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,254 vs 1,895 (137.6% advantage for the EPYC 7302). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2799.

Feature	EPYC 7302	Xeon D-2799
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	20 / 40+25%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3 GHz+25%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+7%	30 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	33,499	33,792
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,500	20,000+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,192	1,959+64%
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,254+441%	1,895

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2799 uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 4 (Xeon D-2799). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 32 (Xeon D-2799) — the EPYC 7302 offers 96 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and Ice Lake-D (Xeon D-2799).

Feature	EPYC 7302	Xeon D-2799
Socket	SP3	FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+300%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	8+100%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+300%	32

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon D-2799 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon D-2799). Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, Xeon D-2799 targets Edge Server / Networking. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Xeon D-2799 rivals EPYC 7302.