EPYC 7302
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7302
2019Why buy it
- ✅+5.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($978 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.3 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 280W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 19,500).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ❌80.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 155W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7302 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7302
The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — a 26.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX (base: 3 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX's 33,455 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7302. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 18,500 (5.3% advantage for the EPYC 7302). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,192 vs 1,652, a 32.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,254 vs 11,500 (11.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 4 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 33,499 | 33,455 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500+5% | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,192 | 1,652+39% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,254 | 11,500+12% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server / Multi-thread Workstation | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7302 was priced at $978, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX came in at $1149. On launch pricing ($978 vs $1149), EPYC 7302 was $171 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7302 delivers 34.3 pts/$ vs 29.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — making the EPYC 7302 the 16.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $978-15% | $1149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.3+18% | 29.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7302 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
