
EPYC 4344P

EPYC 7302
EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 7302 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 7302 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 7302: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4344P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 200.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 7302
2019Why buy it
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4344P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.3 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4344P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4344P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4344P better than EPYC 7302?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 7302 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4344P
The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.

EPYC 7302
The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7302 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 — a 46.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7302 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the EPYC 7302's 33,499 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 4344P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 19,500 (0% advantage for the EPYC 7302). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,192, a 48.7% lead for the EPYC 4344P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 10,254 (137.6% advantage for the EPYC 7302). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+61% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+27% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 33,821 | 33,499 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500 | 19,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960+64% | 1,192 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,896 | 10,254+441% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7302 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 — the EPYC 4344P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4344P) vs 8 (EPYC 7302). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 128 (EPYC 7302) — the EPYC 7302 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302).
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+63% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4344P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7302 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V, SEV |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Server / Multi-thread Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4344P was priced at $329, while the EPYC 7302 came in at $978. On launch pricing ($329 vs $978), EPYC 4344P was $649 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4344P delivers 102.8 pts/$ vs 34.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7302 — making the EPYC 4344P the 100% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-66% | $978 |
| Performance per Dollar | 102.8+200% | 34.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















