EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 7302

AMD

EPYC 4344P

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 7302

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 7302 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 7302 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 7302: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4344P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +40.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $649 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
  • Delivers 200.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
  • Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 7302

2019

Why buy it

  • 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4344P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.3 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • 138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4344P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4344P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4344P better than EPYC 7302?
Yes. EPYC 4344P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 40.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.0% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4344P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 40.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
There is no clear productivity winner in the data we have.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4344P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4344P comes in $649 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $978 MSRP, and it still gives you a 40.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 200.1% better value on MSRP (102.8 vs 34.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4344P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 7302 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4344P

The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

EPYC 7302

The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7302 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 — a 46.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7302 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the EPYC 7302's 33,499 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 4344P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 19,500 (0% advantage for the EPYC 7302). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,192, a 48.7% lead for the EPYC 4344P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 10,254 (137.6% advantage for the EPYC 7302). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 4344PEPYC 7302
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+61%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+27%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
33,821
33,499
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,500
19,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,960+64%
1,192
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,896
10,254+441%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7302 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 — the EPYC 4344P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4344P) vs 8 (EPYC 7302). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 128 (EPYC 7302) — the EPYC 7302 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302).

FeatureEPYC 4344PEPYC 7302
Socket
AM5
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200+63%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
128+357%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4344P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7302 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230.

FeatureEPYC 4344PEPYC 7302
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
AMD-V, SEV
Target Use
Entry Server
Server / Multi-thread Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4344P was priced at $329, while the EPYC 7302 came in at $978. On launch pricing ($329 vs $978), EPYC 4344P was $649 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4344P delivers 102.8 pts/$ vs 34.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7302 — making the EPYC 4344P the 100% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4344PEPYC 7302
MSRP
$329-66%
$978
Performance per Dollar
102.8+200%
34.3
Release Date
2024
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.