EPYC 4344P
VS
Xeon Platinum 8260M

EPYC 4344P vs Xeon Platinum 8260M

AMD

EPYC 4344P

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8260M

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4344P

#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
136%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
117%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
112%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
112%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
107%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
106%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
106%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
102%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
102%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
100%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
95%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
94%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
92%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
81%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8260M

#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
160%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
142%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
110%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
109%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
100%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
100%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The EPYC 4344P leads in gaming performance. However, the Xeon Platinum 8260M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightEPYC 4344PXeon Platinum 8260M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($314)
⚠️ Higher cost ($7,705)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The EPYC 4344P leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 96% cheaper ($314 vs $7,705) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightEPYC 4344PXeon Platinum 8260M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2343%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($314)
⚠️ Higher cost ($7,705)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4344P and Xeon Platinum 8260M

AMD

EPYC 4344P

The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8260M

The Xeon Platinum 8260M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,970 points. Launch price was $7,705.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260M has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260M — a 30.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the Xeon Platinum 8260M's 33,970 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 30,500 (44% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,200, a 48.1% lead for the EPYC 4344P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 10,491 (138.8% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260M). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260M.

FeatureEPYC 4344PXeon Platinum 8260M
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+36%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+58%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
35.75 MB (total)+12%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark
33,821
33,970
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,500
30,500+56%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,960+63%
1,200
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,896
10,491+453%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260M — the EPYC 4344P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8260M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4344P) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260M). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260M) — the Xeon Platinum 8260M offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and C621,C622,C624,C627,C628 (Xeon Platinum 8260M).

FeatureEPYC 4344PXeon Platinum 8260M
Socket
AM5
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200+25%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
48+71%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8260M). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, Xeon Platinum 8260M targets Server (Memory Optimized). Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; Xeon Platinum 8260M rivals Xeon Platinum 8268.

FeatureEPYC 4344PXeon Platinum 8260M
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Entry Server
Server (Memory Optimized)
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4344P launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8260M debuted at $7705.

FeatureEPYC 4344PXeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP
$329-96%
$7705
Avg Price (30d)
$314
Release Date
2024
2019