Core Ultra 9 285H vs EPYC 4344P
Core Ultra 9 285H
EPYC 4344P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285H
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4344P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 285H | EPYC 4344P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($314) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 285H | EPYC 4344P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($314) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 285H and EPYC 4344P
Core Ultra 9 285H
The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.
EPYC 4344P
The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4344P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 4344P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285H scores 34,327 against the EPYC 4344P's 33,821 — a 1.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 26,500 vs 19,500 (30.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,720 vs 1,960, a 32.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,330 vs 1,896 (156% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285H | EPYC 4344P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+2% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,327+1% | 33,821 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 26,500+36% | 19,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,720+39% | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,330+709% | 1,896 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4344P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285H | EPYC 4344P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4344P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 285H) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4344P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation, EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375; EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285H | EPYC 4344P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | High-end Mobile Workstation | Entry Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 285H and EPYC 4344P
