Core Ultra 9 285H
VS
Xeon Gold 6238R

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Xeon Gold 6238R

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

16 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6238R

28 Cores56 Thrd165 WWMax: 4 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285H

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
121%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
112%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
102%
#40
Core Ultra 9 285H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
97%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6238R

#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
128%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
100%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
86%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
82%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
82%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
78%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
78%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
78%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
75%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
75%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
74%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($2,612) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Gold 6238R is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore Ultra 9 285HXeon Gold 6238R
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($2,612)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 9 285H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($2,612 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore Ultra 9 285HXeon Gold 6238R
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($2,612)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 285H and Xeon Gold 6238R

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6238R

The Xeon Gold 6238R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 34,751 points. Launch price was $2,612.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 285H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6238R offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6238R has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6238R — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6238R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285H scores 34,327 against the Xeon Gold 6238R's 34,751 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6238R. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,330 vs 21,433 (33.2% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6238R). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6238R.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285HXeon Gold 6238R
Cores / Threads
16 / 16
28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+35%
4 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+32%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
38.5 MB+60%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)
28 MB+833%
Process
3 nm-79%
14 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
34,327
34,751+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
26,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,720
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,330
21,433+40%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6238R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6238R — the Core Ultra 9 285H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 1 TB 197.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6238R). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6238R) — the Xeon Gold 6238R offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H) and C621,C622,C624,C627,C628 (Xeon Gold 6238R).

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285HXeon Gold 6238R
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400+25%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
1 TB+433%
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
48+71%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6238R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core Ultra 9 285H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)), while the Xeon Gold 6238R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation, Xeon Gold 6238R targets Server. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375; Xeon Gold 6238R rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285HXeon Gold 6238R
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-end Mobile Workstation
Server