Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 9 285H

16 / 16

34,327

0.0%

34,827

+1.5%

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

Ryzen 9 5980HX

Ryzen 5 7600

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 9 285H

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (34,327 vs 34,827).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 9 285H.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 285H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 better than Core Ultra 9 285H?

Yes. Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $400 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (87.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 9 285H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 9 285H

The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,827 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 285H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285H scores 34,327 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745's 34,827 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+2%	5.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)+200%	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-40%	5 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-H (2025)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	34,327	34,827+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	26,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,720	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,330	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus 5200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — the Core Ultra 9 285H supports 61.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H) and AM5 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745).

Feature	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Socket	FCBGA2049	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400+62%	5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28+17%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 285H) and AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375; Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 rivals Core i7-13700.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)	AMD Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use	High-end Mobile Workstation	—