Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 9 285H

16 / 16

34,327

0.0%

34,585

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 9 285H

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 285H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,246 vs 26,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 285H better than Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?

Yes. Core Ultra 9 285H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 19.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 9 285H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 9 285H is the stronger fit. You are getting 19.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 9 285H still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 9 285H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 9 285H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 9 285H

The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 285H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285H scores 34,327 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 26,500 vs 22,246 (17.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,720 vs 2,865, a 5.2% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,330 vs 15,100 (1.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+6%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)+200%	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-25%	4 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-H (2025)	Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
PassMark	34,327	34,585
Cinebench R23 Multi	26,500+19%	22,246
Geekbench 6 Single	2,720	2,865+5%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,330+2%	15,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — the Core Ultra 9 285H supports 5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H) and SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375).

Feature	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Socket	FCBGA2049	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400+5%	LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	28+75%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 285H) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375; Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)	Radeon 890M
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use	High-end Mobile Workstation	AI-Notebook