Core Ultra 9 285H
VS
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

16 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

12 Cores24 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285H

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
121%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
112%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
102%
#40
Core Ultra 9 285H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
97%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Ultra 9 285H is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Ultra 9 285HRyzen AI 9 HX 375
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 9 285HRyzen AI 9 HX 375
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 285H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285H scores 34,327 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 26,500 vs 22,246 (17.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,720 vs 2,865, a 5.2% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,330 vs 15,100 (1.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285HRyzen AI 9 HX 375
Cores / Threads
16 / 16+33%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+6%
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+45%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+200%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
PassMark
34,327
34,585
Cinebench R23 Multi
26,500+19%
22,246
Geekbench 6 Single
2,720
2,865+5%
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,330+2%
15,100
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H) and SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375).

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285HRyzen AI 9 HX 375
Socket
FCBGA2049
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400
LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
256 GB+33%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28+75%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 285H) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375; Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285HRyzen AI 9 HX 375
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)
Radeon 890M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use
High-end Mobile Workstation
AI-Notebook