EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 4364P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4344P

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4364P

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 4364P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4344P

8 / 16

33,821

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

EPYC 4364P

8 / 16

34,215

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 4364P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 4364P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4344P

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 19.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,500 vs 21,000).

EPYC 4364P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 85.8 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4364P better than EPYC 4344P?

Yes. EPYC 4364P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4364P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4364P is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4364P is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 4344P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4364P comes in 21.3% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 4344P is also 19.9% better value on MSRP (102.8 vs 85.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4364P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 4344P vs EPYC 4364P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4344P

The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.

EPYC 4364P

The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 4344P and EPYC 4364P share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P — a 1.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). Both are built on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture using a 5 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the EPYC 4364P's 34,215 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 4364P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 21,000 (7.4% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 3,085, a 44.6% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 15,594 (156.6% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 4344P	EPYC 4364P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz	5.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.8 GHz	4.5 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	33,821	34,215+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,500	21,000+8%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	3,085+57%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,896	15,594+722%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P).

Feature	EPYC 4344P	EPYC 4364P
Socket	AM5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V, AMD-Vi virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4344P) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.

Feature	EPYC 4344P	EPYC 4364P
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, AMD-Vi	AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use	Entry Server	Entry Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4344P was priced at $329, while the EPYC 4364P came in at $399. On launch pricing ($329 vs $399), EPYC 4344P was $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4344P delivers 102.8 pts/$ vs 85.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 4364P — making the EPYC 4344P the 18.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4344P	EPYC 4364P
MSRP	$329-18%	$399
Performance per Dollar	102.8+20%	85.8
Release Date	2024	2024

Search EPYC 4344P on Amazon

Search EPYC 4364P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.