Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Platinum 8270
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Xeon Platinum 8270
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8270
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,405) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Strix Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,405) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 and Xeon Platinum 8270
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon Platinum 8270
The Xeon Platinum 8270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,602 points. Launch price was $7,405.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8270 offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8270 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8270 — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8270 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 33,619 against the Xeon Platinum 8270's 33,602 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,246 vs 32,000 (36% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8270). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,864 vs 1,200, a 81.9% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,012 vs 11,000 (30.8% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8270.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 26 / 52+117% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+27% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 35.75 MB (total)+123% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Point (2024−2025) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 33,619 | 33,602 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,246 | 32,000+44% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,864+139% | 1,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,012+36% | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8270 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8270 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8270 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8270). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8270) — the Xeon Platinum 8270 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8270).
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8000+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 1024 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8270). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Xeon Platinum 8270 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming, Xeon Platinum 8270 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX; Xeon Platinum 8270 rivals Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 890M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming | Server / Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8270 debuted at $7405.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $7405 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 and Xeon Platinum 8270
