
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
2025Why buy it
- β +20.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β Draws 28W instead of 280W, a 252W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- β 700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 22,246).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $1,149 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β900% higher power demand at 280W vs 28W.
- βOlder platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024β2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX β a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 2 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the Strix Point (2024β2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 33,619 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX's 33,455 β a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,246 vs 18,500 (18.4% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,864 vs 1,652, a 53.7% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,012 vs 11,500 (26.5% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+19% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 64 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Point (2024β2025) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 33,619 | 33,455 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,246+20% | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,864+73% | 1,652 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,012+31% | 11,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX β the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX).
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8000+150% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 2048 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 128+700% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 890M | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 was priced at $0, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX came in at $1149. On launch pricing ($0 vs $1149), Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 was $1149 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1149 |
| Performance per Dollar | β | 29.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














