Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Platinum 8260M

CPU

GPU

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

12 Cores24 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8260M

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Platinum 8260M Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

12 / 24

33,619

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon Platinum 8260M

24 / 48

33,970

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Platinum 8260M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Platinum 8260M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

2025

Why buy it

✅+138.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 28W instead of 165W, a 137W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Xeon Platinum 8260M needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Platinum 8260M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,246 vs 30,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8260M, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8260M

2019

Why buy it

✅+37.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+123.4% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,200 vs 2,864).
❌Launch MSRP is still $7,705 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌489.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than Xeon Platinum 8260M?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8260M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8260M is the stronger fit. You are getting 37.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 123.4% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8260M is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $7,705 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8260M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 37.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Xeon Platinum 8260M is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Platinum 8260M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Platinum 8260M

The Xeon Platinum 8260M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,970 points. Launch price was $7,705.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260M has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260M — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 33,619 against the Xeon Platinum 8260M's 33,970 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,246 vs 30,500 (31.3% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,864 vs 1,200, a 81.9% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,012 vs 10,491 (35.5% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260M.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375	Xeon Platinum 8260M
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+31%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	16 MB	35.75 MB (total)+123%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Strix Point (2024−2025)	Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark	33,619	33,970+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	22,246	30,500+37%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,864+139%	1,200
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,012+43%	10,491

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260M — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 172.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8260M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260M). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260M) — the Xeon Platinum 8260M offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) and C621,C622,C624,C627,C628 (Xeon Platinum 8260M).

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375	Xeon Platinum 8260M
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8000+173%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	2048 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	48+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8260M). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming, Xeon Platinum 8260M targets Server (Memory Optimized). Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX; Xeon Platinum 8260M rivals Xeon Platinum 8268.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375	Xeon Platinum 8260M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 890M	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming	Server (Memory Optimized)

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 was priced at $0, while the Xeon Platinum 8260M came in at $7705. On launch pricing ($0 vs $7705), Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 was $7705 cheaper.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375	Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP	$0-100%	$7705
Performance per Dollar	—	4.4
Release Date	2025	2019

Search Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8260M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.