Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon w3-2535

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

12 Cores24 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Xeon w3-2535

10 Cores20 Thrd185 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon w3-2535 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
12 / 24
33,619
+0.8%
brand logoRyzen 9 4900HS
brand logoRyzen 7 3700X
brand logoRyzen 5 7645HX
brand logoRyzen 9 270
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
Xeon w3-2535
10 / 20
33,367
0.0%
brand logoCore i9-11900T
brand logoCore i9-11980HK
brand logoCore i9-10920X
brand logoCore i9-7980XE
brand logoCore Ultra 7 265F
brand logoXeon w9-3475X
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
brand logoXeon w9-3595X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon w3-2535 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low245 FPS
medium230 FPS
high192 FPS
ultra165 FPS
1080P
Xeon w3-2535
low188 FPS
medium156 FPS
high131 FPS
ultra108 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low262 FPS
medium220 FPS
high194 FPS
ultra173 FPS
1080P
Xeon w3-2535
low588 FPS
medium487 FPS
high402 FPS
ultra362 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low738 FPS
medium587 FPS
high508 FPS
ultra429 FPS
1080P
Xeon w3-2535
low834 FPS
medium834 FPS
high834 FPS
ultra834 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low840 FPS
medium809 FPS
high694 FPS
ultra625 FPS
1080P
Xeon w3-2535
low834 FPS
medium834 FPS
high834 FPS
ultra812 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Xeon w3-2535
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low300 FPS
medium295 FPS
high279 FPS
ultra266 FPS
1080P
Xeon w3-2535
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low299 FPS
medium226 FPS
high195 FPS
ultra173 FPS
1080P
Xeon w3-2535
low309 FPS
medium231 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra169 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low263 FPS
medium233 FPS
high181 FPS
ultra144 FPS
1080P
Xeon w3-2535
low292 FPS
medium256 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra175 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low271 FPS
medium233 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra179 FPS
1080P
Xeon w3-2535
low318 FPS
medium268 FPS
high225 FPS
ultra195 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
low236 FPS
medium217 FPS
high180 FPS
ultra168 FPS
1080P
Xeon w3-2535
low244 FPS
medium223 FPS
high187 FPS
ultra172 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon w3-2535: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅+27.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • ✅Draws 28W instead of 185W, a 157W reduction.
  • ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Xeon w3-2535 needs a discrete GPU.
  • ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon w3-2535.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w3-2535 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 26 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w3-2535, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon w3-2535

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅+64.1% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 16 MB).
  • ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 16.
  • ✅300% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 22,246).
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $739 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌560.7% higher power demand at 185W vs 28W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than Xeon w3-2535?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w3-2535 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the stronger fit. You are getting 27.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon w3-2535 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $739 MSRP, and it still gives you 27.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Xeon w3-2535 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 19.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon w3-2535 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (45.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon w3-2535 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon w3-2535

The Xeon w3-2535 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 33,367 points. Launch price was $739.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w3-2535 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w3-2535 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w3-2535 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 33,619 against the Xeon w3-2535's 33,367 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,246 vs 17,500 (23.9% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,864 vs 2,254, a 23.8% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,012 vs 12,400 (19.1% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon w3-2535.

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375Xeon w3-2535
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+20%
10 / 20
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+11%
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
16 MB
26.25 MB+64%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
4 nm-43%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Strix Point (2024−2025)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
33,619
33,367
Cinebench R23 Multi
22,246+27%
17,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,864+27%
2,254
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,012+21%
12,400
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2535 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon w3-2535 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 81.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w3-2535 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 4 (Xeon w3-2535). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 64 (Xeon w3-2535) — the Xeon w3-2535 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) and W790 (Xeon w3-2535).

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375Xeon w3-2535
Socket
FP8
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8000+82%
DDR5-4400
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
2048 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
64+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon w3-2535). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Xeon w3-2535 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming, Xeon w3-2535 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX; Xeon w3-2535 rivals EPYC 7313.

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375Xeon w3-2535
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon 890M
—
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, IOMMU
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 was priced at $0, while the Xeon w3-2535 came in at $739. On launch pricing ($0 vs $739), Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 was $739 cheaper.

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375Xeon w3-2535
MSRP
$0-100%
$739
Performance per Dollar
—
45.2
Release Date
2025
2024
Search Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 on AmazonSearch Xeon w3-2535 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.