EPYC 4364P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4364P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 22,246).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
2025Why buy it
- ✅+5.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 4364P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than EPYC 4364P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4364P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375's 33,619 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 4364P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 22,246 (5.8% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,085 vs 2,864, a 7.4% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,594 vs 15,012 (3.8% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+125% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,215+2% | 33,619 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | 22,246+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,085+8% | 2,864 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,594+4% | 15,012 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4364P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 53.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4364P) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) — the EPYC 4364P offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375).
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | LPDDR5x-8000+54% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+75% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488; Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V, IOMMU |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4364P was priced at $399, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($399 vs $0), Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 was $399 cheaper.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.8 | — |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4364P and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
