Core Ultra 7 265H
EPYC 4364P
Core Ultra 7 265H vs EPYC 4364P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 265H vs EPYC 4364P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 265H vs EPYC 4364P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 265H
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 105W, a 79W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
EPYC 4364P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,215 vs 34,702).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 265H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌303.8% higher power demand at 105W vs 26W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 265H better than EPYC 4364P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 265H vs EPYC 4364P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 7 265H
The Core Ultra 7 265H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,702 points. Launch price was $471.
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4364P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P — a 1.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 4364P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265H scores 34,702 against the EPYC 4364P's 34,215 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265H. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265H vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,702+1% | 34,215 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,085 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,594 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4364P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8400 on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P — the Core Ultra 7 265H supports 61.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: BGA 2049 (Core Ultra 7 265H) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8400+62% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 140T GPU (Core Ultra 7 265H) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370; EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 140T GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | — | Entry Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265H and EPYC 4364P
