Core Ultra 7 265H vs EPYC 4364P
Core Ultra 7 265H
EPYC 4364P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265H
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4364P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265H | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($334) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265H | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($334) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265H and EPYC 4364P
Core Ultra 7 265H
The Core Ultra 7 265H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,702 points. Launch price was $471.
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4364P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P — a 1.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 4364P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265H scores 34,702 against the EPYC 4364P's 34,215 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265H. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265H vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,702+1% | 34,215 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,085 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,594 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4364P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8400 on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P — the Core Ultra 7 265H supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: BGA 2049 (Core Ultra 7 265H) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8400+167900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 192 GB+157286300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 140T GPU (Core Ultra 7 265H) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370; EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 140T GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | — | Entry Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265H and EPYC 4364P
