Core Ultra 7 265H
VS
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

Core Ultra 7 265H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

12 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265H

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
114%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
107%
#56
Core Ultra 7 265H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 7 265H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265HRyzen 9 PRO 5945
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Vermeer (2020−2025) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 7 265HRyzen 9 PRO 5945
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265H and Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265H

The Core Ultra 7 265H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,702 points. Launch price was $471.

AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 34,549 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 265H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 — a 12% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265H (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265H scores 34,702 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945's 34,549 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265H. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265H vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HRyzen 9 PRO 5945
Cores / Threads
16 / 16+33%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+13%
4.7 GHz
Base Clock
4.5 GHz+50%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB
64 MB+167%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark
34,702
34,549
Cinebench R23 Multi
23,200
Geekbench 6 Single
2,175
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8400 on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 — the Core Ultra 7 265H supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) — the Core Ultra 7 265H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA 2049 (Core Ultra 7 265H) and X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HRyzen 9 PRO 5945
Socket
FCBGA2049
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
8400+209900%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128
128 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28+40%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core Ultra 7 265H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945). The Core Ultra 7 265H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T GPU), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370; Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 rivals Core i9-12900.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HRyzen 9 PRO 5945
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T GPU
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V (SVM)
Target Use
High-end Gaming