Core Ultra 7 265H vs Xeon W-3265M
Core Ultra 7 265H
Xeon W-3265M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265H
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265H | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265H | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265H and Xeon W-3265M
Core Ultra 7 265H
The Core Ultra 7 265H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,702 points. Launch price was $471.
Xeon W-3265M
The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3265M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265H (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3265M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265H scores 34,702 against the Xeon W-3265M's 35,506 — a 2.3% lead for the Xeon W-3265M. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265H vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+15% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+67% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 33 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | — | 24 MB |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 34,702 | 35,506+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3265M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8400 on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M — the Core Ultra 7 265H supports 96.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265M supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 128 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265M). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265M) — the Xeon W-3265M offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA 2049 (Core Ultra 7 265H) and C620 (Xeon W-3265M).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8400+186% | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 1024+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 265H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T GPU), while the Xeon W-3265M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370; Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | Xeon W-3265M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 140T GPU | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265H and Xeon W-3265M
