Core Ultra 7 265H
VS
Xeon Platinum 8268

Core Ultra 7 265H vs Xeon Platinum 8268

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8268

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265H

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
114%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
107%
#56
Core Ultra 7 265H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8268

#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
143%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
111%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
110%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
101%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
100%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 265H (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265HXeon Platinum 8268
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($6,302)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Platinum 8268 (2019) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265HXeon Platinum 8268
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($6,302)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265H and Xeon Platinum 8268

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265H

The Core Ultra 7 265H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,702 points. Launch price was $471.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8268

The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 265H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8268 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 30.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265H (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265H scores 34,702 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8268. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265H vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXeon Platinum 8268
Cores / Threads
16 / 16
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+36%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
4.5 GHz+55%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB
35.75 MB (total)+49%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark
34,702
35,081+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
24,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,394
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,046
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8400 on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the Core Ultra 7 265H supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8268 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8268). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8268) — the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA 2049 (Core Ultra 7 265H) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXeon Platinum 8268
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
8400+209900%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128
1024 GB+838860700%
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
48+71%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). The Core Ultra 7 265H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T GPU), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265HXeon Platinum 8268
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T GPU
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-end Server