Core Ultra 7 265H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Core Ultra 7 265H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 7 265H

16 / 16

34,702

+0.3%

34,585

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 265H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 265H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 265H

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 26W instead of 28W, a 2W reduction.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

2024

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 265H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (34,585 vs 34,702).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 265H better than Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?

Yes. Core Ultra 7 265H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 33.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 265H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 33.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 265H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 265H still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 7 265H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 33.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 265H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Ultra 7 265H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 265H

The Core Ultra 7 265H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,702 points. Launch price was $471.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 265H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265H (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265H scores 34,702 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265H. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 265H	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+4%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	4.5 GHz+125%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB+50%	16 MB
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	Arrow Lake-H (2025)	Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
PassMark	34,702	34,585
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	22,246
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,865
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8400 on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — the Core Ultra 7 265H supports 5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — the Core Ultra 7 265H offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA 2049 (Core Ultra 7 265H) and SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375).

Feature	Core Ultra 7 265H	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Socket	FCBGA2049	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	8400+5%	LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	28+75%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 140T GPU (Core Ultra 7 265H) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370; Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.