Core Ultra 7 265H
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Core Ultra 7 265H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 265H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 265H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 265H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 65W, a 39W reduction.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,702 vs 34,827).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 7 265H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 265H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 65W vs 26W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 better than Core Ultra 7 265H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 265H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 7 265H
The Core Ultra 7 265H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,702 points. Launch price was $471.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,827 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265H scores 34,702 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745's 34,827 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+18% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,702 | 34,827 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8400 on the Core Ultra 7 265H versus 5200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — the Core Ultra 7 265H supports 61.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — the Core Ultra 7 265H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA 2049 (Core Ultra 7 265H) and AM5 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8400+62% | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265H) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 140T GPU (Core Ultra 7 265H) and AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370; Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 rivals Core i7-13700.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265H | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 140T GPU | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, IOMMU |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265H and Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
