EPYC 4364P
Ryzen 9 5900
EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen 9 5900 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen 9 5900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen 9 5900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4364P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 85.8 vs 61.8 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Ryzen 9 5900
2021Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,912 vs 34,215).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.8 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4364P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4364P better than Ryzen 9 5900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4364P vs Ryzen 9 5900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.
Ryzen 9 5900
The Ryzen 9 5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,912 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4364P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900 — a 13.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Ryzen 9 5900's 33,912 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 4364P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+15% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+50% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,215 | 33,912 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,085 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,594 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4364P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900 — the EPYC 4364P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4364P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900) — the EPYC 4364P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+63% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4364P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900). The EPYC 4364P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 9 5900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server, Ryzen 9 5900 targets OEM Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Server | OEM Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4364P was priced at $399, while the Ryzen 9 5900 came in at $549. On launch pricing ($399 vs $549), EPYC 4364P was $150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4364P delivers 85.8 pts/$ vs 61.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900 — making the EPYC 4364P the 32.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-27% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.8+39% | 61.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 9 5900
