EPYC 4364P vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
EPYC 4364P
Xeon Platinum 8260M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4364P
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8260M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 4364P | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($334) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,705) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 4364P | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2224%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($334) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,705) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4364P and Xeon Platinum 8260M
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.
Xeon Platinum 8260M
The Xeon Platinum 8260M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,970 points. Launch price was $7,705.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4364P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260M has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260M — a 32.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4364P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4364P scores 34,215 against the Xeon Platinum 8260M's 33,970 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 4364P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 30,500 (36.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,085 vs 1,200, a 88% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,594 vs 10,491 (39.1% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260M.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+38% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+88% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 35.75 MB (total)+12% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 34,215 | 33,970 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | 30,500+45% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,085+157% | 1,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,594+49% | 10,491 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4364P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260M — the EPYC 4364P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8260M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4364P) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260M). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4364P) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260M) — the Xeon Platinum 8260M offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P) and C621,C622,C624,C627,C628 (Xeon Platinum 8260M).
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 48+71% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8260M). The EPYC 4364P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8260M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server, Xeon Platinum 8260M targets Server (Memory Optimized). Direct competitor: EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488; Xeon Platinum 8260M rivals Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Server (Memory Optimized) |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4364P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8260M debuted at $7705.
| Feature | EPYC 4364P | Xeon Platinum 8260M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-95% | $7705 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $334 | — |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4364P and Xeon Platinum 8260M
