Xeon E-2276M vs Xeon E5-4628L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2276M vs Xeon E5-4628L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2276M vs Xeon E5-4628L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2276M

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4628L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $939 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4628L v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4628L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,503 vs 11,654).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2276M better than Xeon E5-4628L v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-4628L v4 is ahead with a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2276M pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4628L v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2276M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2276M is the better buy right now. Xeon E-2276M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $939 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4628L v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2276M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 14/28. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2276M vs Xeon E5-4628L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2276M

The Xeon E-2276M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,654 points. Launch price was $450.

Xeon E5-4628L v4

The Xeon E5-4628L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,503 points. Launch price was $2,535.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2276M packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4628L v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-4628L v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Xeon E-2276M versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4628L v4 — a 89.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2276M. The Xeon E-2276M uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4628L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2276M scores 11,654 against the Xeon E5-4628L v4's 11,503 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E-2276M. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2276M vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-4628L v4.

Feature	Xeon E-2276M	Xeon E5-4628L v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 28+133%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+161%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	35 MB+192%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	3.5 MB+1300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	11,654+1%	11,503