Xeon E-2276M vs Xeon E5-2648L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2276M vs Xeon E5-2648L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2276M vs Xeon E5-2648L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2276M

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2648L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,654 vs 11,839).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $939 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2648L v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2648L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2648L v4 better than Xeon E-2276M?

Yes. Xeon E5-2648L v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2648L v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2648L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2648L v4 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-2648L v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $939 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E-2276M only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.8% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2276M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E-2276M vs Xeon E5-2648L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2276M

The Xeon E-2276M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,654 points. Launch price was $450.

Xeon E5-2648L v4

The Xeon E5-2648L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,839 points. Launch price was $1,544.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2276M packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2648L v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2648L v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Xeon E-2276M versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2648L v4 — a 89.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2276M. The Xeon E-2276M uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2648L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2276M scores 11,654 against the Xeon E5-2648L v4's 11,839 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2648L v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2276M vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2648L v4.

Feature	Xeon E-2276M	Xeon E5-2648L v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 28+133%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+161%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	35 MB+192%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	3.5 MB+1300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	11,654	11,839+2%