PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon E-2278G

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Xeon Gold 6134 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6134

2017

Why buy it

✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2278G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,519 vs 16,825).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,214 MSRP, while Xeon E-2278G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E-2278G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon E-2278G

2019

Xeon Gold 6134

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Xeon Gold 6134 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2278G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,519 vs 16,825).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,214 MSRP, while Xeon E-2278G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E-2278G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2278G better than Xeon Gold 6134?

Yes. Xeon E-2278G is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 10.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2278G is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2278G is the better fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2278G is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6134 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon E-2278G is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,214 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6134 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2278G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon E-2278G Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6134 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon E-2278G	Xeon Gold 6134
1080p
low	265 FPS	179 FPS
medium	240 FPS	143 FPS
high	201 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	233 FPS	145 FPS
medium	192 FPS	113 FPS
high	155 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	160 FPS	67 FPS
medium	134 FPS	56 FPS
high	103 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	35 FPS

Open Xeon E-2278G Open Xeon Gold 6134

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon E-2278G	Xeon Gold 6134
1080p
low	417 FPS	400 FPS
medium	348 FPS	346 FPS
high	308 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	276 FPS	245 FPS
1440p
low	369 FPS	346 FPS
medium	324 FPS	307 FPS
high	285 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	216 FPS
4K
low	248 FPS	225 FPS
medium	223 FPS	200 FPS
high	216 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	185 FPS	148 FPS

Open Xeon E-2278G Open Xeon Gold 6134

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon E-2278G	Xeon Gold 6134
1080p
low	421 FPS	413 FPS
medium	421 FPS	413 FPS
high	421 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	413 FPS
1440p
low	421 FPS	413 FPS
medium	421 FPS	413 FPS
high	421 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	362 FPS	413 FPS
4K
low	421 FPS	413 FPS
medium	390 FPS	369 FPS
high	341 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	267 FPS

Open Xeon E-2278G Open Xeon Gold 6134

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon E-2278G	Xeon Gold 6134
1080p
low	421 FPS	413 FPS
medium	421 FPS	413 FPS
high	421 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	413 FPS
1440p
low	421 FPS	413 FPS
medium	421 FPS	413 FPS
high	421 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	413 FPS
4K
low	421 FPS	413 FPS
medium	421 FPS	413 FPS
high	421 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	351 FPS

Open Xeon E-2278G Open Xeon Gold 6134

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2278G and Xeon Gold 6134

Xeon E-2278G

The Xeon E-2278G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,825 points. Launch price was $494.

Xeon Gold 6134

The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E-2278G and Xeon Gold 6134 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2278G versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 29.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2278G (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E-2278G uses the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2278G scores 16,825 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon E-2278G. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2278G vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.

Feature	Xeon E-2278G	Xeon Gold 6134
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz+35%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	24.75 MB+55%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	8 MB+3100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	16,825+2%	16,519

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2278G uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon E-2278G versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6134 — the Xeon Gold 6134 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6134 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon E-2278G) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6134). PCIe lanes: 16 (Xeon E-2278G) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6134) — the Xeon Gold 6134 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C242,C246 (Xeon E-2278G) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6134).

Feature	Xeon E-2278G	Xeon Gold 6134
Socket	LGA1151	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	2666+66550%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+17476167%	768
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	48+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6134 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E-2278G) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6134). The Xeon E-2278G includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Xeon Gold 6134 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E-2278G targets Server.