
Core Ultra 5 228V

Xeon E-2278G
Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon E-2278G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon E-2278G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon E-2278G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024Why buy it
- β +0.8% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 17W instead of 80W, a 63W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2278G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2278G, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $295 MSRP, while Xeon E-2278G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2278G
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 8.
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (16,825 vs 16,955).
- β370.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 17W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 228V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 228V better than Xeon E-2278G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon E-2278G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 228V
The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2278G
The Xeon E-2278G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,825 points. Launch price was $494.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 228V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E-2278G's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2278G β a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2278G (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon E-2278G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 228V scores 16,955 against the Xeon E-2278G's 16,825 β a 0.8% lead for the Core Ultra 5 228V. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2278G.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 228V | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+62% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+900% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 16,955 | 16,825 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,932 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,585 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,053 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2278G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon E-2278G β the Core Ultra 5 228V supports 220.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E-2278G supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 5 228V) vs 16 (Xeon E-2278G) β the Xeon E-2278G offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 5 228V) and C242,C246 (Xeon E-2278G).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 228V | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533+220% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E-2278G). Both include integrated graphics β Arc 130V (Core Ultra 5 228V) and Intel UHD Graphics P630 (Xeon E-2278G) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E-2278G targets Server.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 228V | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Arc 130V | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | β | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













