Xeon E-2278G vs Xeon W-3223

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2278G vs Xeon W-3223 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2278G vs Xeon W-3223: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2278G

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Xeon W-3223 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,825 vs 16,956).

Xeon W-3223

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2278G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Xeon E-2278G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E-2278G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3223 better than Xeon E-2278G?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E-2278G is ahead with a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3223 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3223 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3223 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3223 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E-2278G is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (57.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3223 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2278G vs Xeon W-3223 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2278G

The Xeon E-2278G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,825 points. Launch price was $494.

Xeon W-3223

The Xeon W-3223 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,956 points. Launch price was $749.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E-2278G and Xeon W-3223 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2278G versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-3223 — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2278G (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E-2278G uses the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3223 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2278G scores 16,825 against the Xeon W-3223's 16,956 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W-3223. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2278G vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3223.

Feature	Xeon E-2278G	Xeon W-3223
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz+19%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16.5 MB+3%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	8 MB+3100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	16,825	16,956

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2278G uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3223 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E-2278G	Xeon W-3223
Socket	LGA1151	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E-2278G) / not specified (Xeon W-3223). The Xeon E-2278G includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Xeon W-3223 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E-2278G targets Server.