Xeon E-2324G vs Xeon Silver 4110

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2324G vs Xeon Silver 4110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2324G vs Xeon Silver 4110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2324G

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4110 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4110

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,314 vs 10,339).
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2324G better than Xeon Silver 4110?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4110 is ahead with a 31.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2324G pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Xeon Silver 4110 also has the bigger cache pool with 37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2324G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2324G still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2324G comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2324G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2324G vs Xeon Silver 4110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2324G

The Xeon E-2324G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,339 points. Launch price was $209.

Xeon Silver 4110

The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2324G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4110 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2324G versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2324G (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E-2324G uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2324G scores 10,339 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E-2324G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2324G vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4110.

Feature	Xeon E-2324G	Xeon Silver 4110
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+53%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+48%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	11 MB+38%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	8 MB+1500%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake-E (2021)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	10,339	10,314

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2324G uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.