Xeon E-2356G
VS
Core 5 210H

Xeon E-2356G vs Core 5 210H

Intel

Xeon E-2356G

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 5 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core 5 210H

8 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E-2356G

#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
103%
#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
100%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
99%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
98%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
97%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 5 210H

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
102%
#149
Core 5 210H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
96%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
94%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($544) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E-2356G is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E-2356GCore 5 210H
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($544)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-E (2021) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 5 210H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($544 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E-2356GCore 5 210H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($544)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2356G and Core 5 210H

Intel

Xeon E-2356G

The Xeon E-2356G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,459 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core 5 210H

The Core 5 210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 18,602 points. Launch price was $342.

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2356G packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core 5 210H offers 8 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 210H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2356G versus 4.8 GHz on the Core 5 210H — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2356G (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E-2356G uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 5 210H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2356G scores 18,459 against the Core 5 210H's 18,602 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 5 210H. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon E-2356GCore 5 210H
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 12+33%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+4%
4.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+45%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+300%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
PassMark
18,459
18,602
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2356G uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 5 210H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E-2356GCore 5 210H
Socket
LGA1200
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0