Xeon E3-1235 vs Xeon Platinum 8260L
Xeon E3-1235
Xeon Platinum 8260L
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1235 is positioned at rank 607 and the Xeon Platinum 8260L is on rank 1030, so the Xeon E3-1235 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1235
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8260L
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1235 | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($270) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($750) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1235 | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+178%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($270) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($750) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1235 and Xeon Platinum 8260L
Xeon E3-1235
The Xeon E3-1235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,112 points. Launch price was $287.
Xeon Platinum 8260L
The Xeon Platinum 8260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 5,103 points. Launch price was $12,599.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1235 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260L offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260L has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1235 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260L — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260L (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E3-1235 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260L uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1235 scores 5,112 against the Xeon Platinum 8260L's 5,103 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E3-1235. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1235 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8260L.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1235 | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 24 / 48+500% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+33% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+347% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 24 MB+9500% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 5,112 | 5,103 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1235 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260L uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1235 | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4608 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1235) / true (Xeon Platinum 8260L).
| Feature | Xeon E3-1235 | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1235 launched at $240 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8260L debuted at $7500. At current prices ($270 vs $750), the Xeon E3-1235 is $480 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1235 delivers 18.9 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8260L — making the Xeon E3-1235 the 94.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1235 | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $240-97% | $7500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $270-64% | $750 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.9+178% | 6.8 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1235 and Xeon Platinum 8260L
