Xeon E3-1235 vs Xeon E5-1607 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1235 vs Xeon E5-1607 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1235 vs Xeon E5-1607 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1235

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,112 vs 5,197).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $240 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1607 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-1607 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1235 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1235 better than Xeon E5-1607 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E3-1235 is ahead with a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1607 v4 pulls ahead with 1.7% better PassMark. Xeon E5-1607 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1607 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1235 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1235 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $240 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1607 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1607 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011), 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E3-1235 vs Xeon E5-1607 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1235

The Xeon E3-1235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,112 points. Launch price was $287.

Xeon E5-1607 v4

The Xeon E5-1607 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,197 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1235 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E5-1607 v4's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1235 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v4 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1235 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E3-1235 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1235 scores 5,112 against the Xeon E5-1607 v4's 5,197 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E5-1607 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1235 vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-1607 v4.

Feature	Xeon E3-1235	Xeon E5-1607 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+16%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+3%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10 MB+25%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	5,112	5,197+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1235 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.