
Xeon E3-1240 v2

Xeon E3-1275L v3
Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Xeon E3-1275L v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Xeon E3-1275L v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Xeon E3-1275L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E3-1240 v2
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.5 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 69W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1275L v3 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon E3-1275L v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 69W, a 24W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics P4600, while Xeon E3-1240 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1240 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,327 vs 6,385).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 25.5 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1240 v2 better than Xeon E3-1275L v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Xeon E3-1275L v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1240 v2
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $304.

Xeon E3-1275L v3
The Xeon E3-1275L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 6,327 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Xeon E3-1275L v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v2 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1275L v3 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1275L v3 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon E3-1240 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1240 v2 scores 6,385 against the Xeon E3-1275L v3's 6,327 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E3-1240 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E3-1275L v3.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v2 | Xeon E3-1275L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+26% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | — |
| PassMark | 6,385 | 6,327 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1275L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v2 | Xeon E3-1275L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1240 v2) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1275L v3). The Xeon E3-1275L v3 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics P4600), while the Xeon E3-1240 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1275L v3 targets Low Power Server. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1275L v3 rivals Xeon E3-1270 v3.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v2 | Xeon E3-1275L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Low Power Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E3-1240 v2 was priced at $250, while the Xeon E3-1275L v3 came in at $350. On launch pricing ($250 vs $350), Xeon E3-1240 v2 was $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1240 v2 delivers 25.5 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1275L v3 — making the Xeon E3-1240 v2 the 34.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v2 | Xeon E3-1275L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-29% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.5+41% | 18.1 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















