Xeon E3-1260L
VS
Athlon PRO 300U

Xeon E3-1260L vs Athlon PRO 300U

Intel

Xeon E3-1260L

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Athlon PRO 300U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1260L is positioned at rank 750 and the Athlon PRO 300U is on rank 1006, so the Xeon E3-1260L offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1260L

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14994%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2831%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2515%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1943%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
100%
#435
Xeon Gold 6354
MSRP: $2878|Avg: $2898
99%
#436
Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP: $1572|Avg: $1349
98%
#437
Xeon 6960P
MSRP: $9625|Avg: $9625
98%
#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
98%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
97%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
97%
#750
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
100%
#758
Xeon E3-1281 v3
MSRP: $555|Avg: $636
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon PRO 300U

#994
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2157%
#995
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2126%
#996
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1951%
#997
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1943%
#998
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1925%
#1000
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1859%
#1001
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1782%
#1002
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1779%
#1003
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1732%
#1006
Athlon PRO 300U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
100%
#1010
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
99%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
98%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
97%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
96%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
95%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
94%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon PRO 300U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E3-1260LAthlon PRO 300U
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($270)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Raven Ridge 2 (2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E3-1260L (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E3-1260LAthlon PRO 300U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($270)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1260L and Athlon PRO 300U

Intel

Xeon E3-1260L

The Xeon E3-1260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,076 points. Launch price was $150.

AMD

Athlon PRO 300U

The Athlon PRO 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,080 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1260L packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Athlon PRO 300U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E3-1260L has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1260L versus 3.3 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E3-1260L uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon PRO 300U uses Raven Ridge 2 (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1260L scores 4,076 against the Athlon PRO 300U's 4,080 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon PRO 300U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1260L vs 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 300U.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LAthlon PRO 300U
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
PassMark
4,076
4,080
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1260L uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon PRO 300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LAthlon PRO 300U
Socket
LGA1155
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

The Athlon PRO 300U includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E3-1260L requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LAthlon PRO 300U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Vega 3