Xeon E3-1260L
VS
Core i5-2500

Xeon E3-1260L vs Core i5-2500

Intel

Xeon E3-1260L

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i5-2500

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1260L is positioned at rank 750 and the Core i5-2500 is on rank 922, so the Xeon E3-1260L offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1260L

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14994%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2831%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2515%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1943%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
100%
#435
Xeon Gold 6354
MSRP: $2878|Avg: $2898
99%
#436
Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP: $1572|Avg: $1349
98%
#437
Xeon 6960P
MSRP: $9625|Avg: $9625
98%
#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
98%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
97%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
97%
#750
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
100%
#758
Xeon E3-1281 v3
MSRP: $555|Avg: $636
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
22345%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
21114%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15330%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4618%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3658%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3200%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1833%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1809%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1647%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1647%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1629%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1585%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1563%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1556%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1542%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
97%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
96%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
100%
#923
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
98%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
98%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
98%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
98%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
98%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
97%
#932
Pentium E6800
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
96%
#933
Core i3-530
MSRP: $113|Avg: $15
96%
#935
Core i3-2105
MSRP: $138|Avg: $30
95%
#936
Athlon II X3 405e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
#937
Core i3-3225
MSRP: $172|Avg: $167
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($270) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1260L is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E3-1260LCore i5-2500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($270)
More affordable ($69)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2500 ($69), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($201 less, 74% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E3-1260LCore i5-2500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+294%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($270)
More affordable ($69)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1260L and Core i5-2500

Intel

Xeon E3-1260L

The Xeon E3-1260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,076 points. Launch price was $150.

Intel

Core i5-2500

The Core i5-2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,102 points. Launch price was $85.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1260L packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-2500's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1260L versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-2500 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1260L scores 4,076 against the Core i5-2500's 4,102 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-2500. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1260L vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LCore i5-2500
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz+12%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
4,076
4,102
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,642
Geekbench 6 Single
590
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,690
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 2.0.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LCore i5-2500
Socket
LGA1155
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1260L) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2500). The Core i5-2500 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 2000), while the Xeon E3-1260L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500 targets Desktop.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LCore i5-2500
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E3-1260L launched at $294 MSRP, while the Core i5-2500 debuted at $294. At current prices ($270 vs $69), the Core i5-2500 is $201 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1260L delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 59.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-2500 — making the Core i5-2500 the 119% better value option.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LCore i5-2500
MSRP
$294
$294
Avg Price (30d)
$270
$69-74%
Performance per Dollar
15.1
59.4+293%
Release Date
2011
2011