CPU
GPU
Xeon E3-1260L
Core i3-8145UE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1260L is positioned at rank 750 and the Core i3-8145UE is on rank 995, so the Xeon E3-1260L offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1260L
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-8145UE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1260L | Core i3-8145UE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($270) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1260L | Core i3-8145UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+433%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($270) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-8145UE
Xeon E3-1260L
The Xeon E3-1260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,076 points. Launch price was $150.
Core i3-8145UE
The Core i3-8145UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,021 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1260L packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-8145UE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E3-1260L has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1260L versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-8145UE — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-8145UE (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E3-1260L uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-8145UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1260L scores 4,076 against the Core i3-8145UE's 4,021 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1260L. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1260L vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-8145UE.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1260L | Core i3-8145UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+9% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 10 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 4,076+1% | 4,021 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,356 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,218 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,356 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1260L uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-8145UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1260L | Core i3-8145UE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FCBGA1528 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1260L) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8145UE). The Core i3-8145UE includes integrated graphics (UHD 620), while the Xeon E3-1260L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8145UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-8145UE rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1260L | Core i3-8145UE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD 620 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1260L launched at $294 MSRP, while the Core i3-8145UE debuted at $281. At current prices ($270 vs $50), the Core i3-8145UE is $220 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1260L delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 80.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-8145UE — making the Core i3-8145UE the 136.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1260L | Core i3-8145UE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294 | $281-4% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $270 | $50-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.1 | 80.4+432% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-8145UE
