Xeon E3-1260L
VS
Core i7-2720QM

Xeon E3-1260L vs Core i7-2720QM

Intel

Xeon E3-1260L

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i7-2720QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1260L is positioned at rank 750 and the Core i7-2720QM is on rank 1062, so the Xeon E3-1260L offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1260L

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14994%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2831%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2515%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1943%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
100%
#435
Xeon Gold 6354
MSRP: $2878|Avg: $2898
99%
#436
Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP: $1572|Avg: $1349
98%
#437
Xeon 6960P
MSRP: $9625|Avg: $9625
98%
#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
98%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
97%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
97%
#750
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
100%
#758
Xeon E3-1281 v3
MSRP: $555|Avg: $636
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2720QM

#1050
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2763%
#1051
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2722%
#1052
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2499%
#1053
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2488%
#1054
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2465%
#1056
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2380%
#1057
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2282%
#1058
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2279%
#1059
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2218%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
99%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
98%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
98%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
97%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
97%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($270) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1260L is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E3-1260LCore i7-2720QM
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($270)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2720QM ($378), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($108 less, 40% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E3-1260LCore i7-2720QM
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+42%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($270)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1260L and Core i7-2720QM

Intel

Xeon E3-1260L

The Xeon E3-1260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,076 points. Launch price was $150.

Intel

Core i7-2720QM

The Core i7-2720QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,015 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E3-1260L and Core i7-2720QM share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1260L versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-2720QM — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1260L scores 4,076 against the Core i7-2720QM's 4,015 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1260L. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1260L vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2720QM.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LCore i7-2720QM
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+9%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
4,076+2%
4,015
Geekbench 6 Single
700
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1260L uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2720QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LCore i7-2720QM
Socket
LGA1155
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1260L) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-2720QM). The Core i7-2720QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon E3-1260L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2720QM targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2720QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LCore i7-2720QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Performance Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E3-1260L launched at $294 MSRP, while the Core i7-2720QM debuted at $378.

FeatureXeon E3-1260LCore i7-2720QM
MSRP
$294-22%
$378
Avg Price (30d)
$270
Release Date
2011
2011