
Xeon E3-1285 v4

Xeon E5-2620 v3
Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E3-1285 v4
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2620 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 18.5 PassMark/$ ($556 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
Xeon E5-2620 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($417 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 33.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 95W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,734 vs 7,735).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2620 v3 better than Xeon E3-1285 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1285 v4
The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,735 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2620 v3
The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,734 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1285 v4 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1285 v4 scores 7,735 against the Xeon E5-2620 v3's 7,734 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E3-1285 v4. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v3.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1285 v4 | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+19% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+46% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-DT (2015) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 7,735 | 7,734 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1285 v4 | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1285 v4) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2620 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2620 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1285 v4 | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E3-1285 v4 was priced at $556, while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 came in at $417. On launch pricing ($556 vs $417), Xeon E5-2620 v3 was $139 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1285 v4 delivers 13.9 pts/$ vs 18.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — making the Xeon E5-2620 v3 the 28.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1285 v4 | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $556 | $417-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9 | 18.5+33% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















