Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon X7350

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon X7350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon X7350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1285 v4

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,735 vs 7,836).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $556 MSRP, while Xeon X7350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X7350

2007

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1285 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1285 v4 better than Xeon X7350?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E3-1285 v4 is ahead with a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7350 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Xeon X7350 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1285 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1285 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $556 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon X7350 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1285 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon X7350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1285 v4

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,735 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X7350

The Xeon X7350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Tigerton (2007) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,836 points. Launch price was $2,301.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X7350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon X7350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 versus 0.93 GHz on the Xeon X7350 — a 121.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X7350 uses Tigerton (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1285 v4 scores 7,735 against the Xeon X7350's 7,836 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon X7350. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X7350.

Feature	Xeon E3-1285 v4	Xeon X7350
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+309%	0.93 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+19%	2.93 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB L2 Cache+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4 MB (total)+1500%
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-DT (2015)	Tigerton (2007)
PassMark	7,735	7,836+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon X7350 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E3-1285 v4	Xeon X7350
Socket	LGA1150	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR2-667
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1285 v4) / VT-x (Xeon X7350). Primary use case: Xeon X7350 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7350 rivals Core i3-2100.