Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon X7550
Xeon E3-1285 v4
Xeon X7550
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is positioned at rank 748 and the Xeon X7550 is on rank 985, so the Xeon E3-1285 v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1285 v4
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X7550
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1285 v4 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,400) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-DT (2015) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1285 v4 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+588%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon X7550
Xeon E3-1285 v4
The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,735 points. Launch price was $800.
Xeon X7550
The Xeon X7550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 7,873 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1285 v4 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X7550 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon X7550 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon X7550 — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is built on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1285 v4 scores 7,735 against the Xeon X7550's 7,873 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon X7550. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X7550.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1285 v4 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+75% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 18 MB L3 Cache+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-DT (2015) | — |
| PassMark | 7,735 | 7,873+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon X7550 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1285 v4 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1567 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1285 v4) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X7550). Primary use case: Xeon X7550 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7550 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1285 v4 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1285 v4 launched at $556 MSRP, while the Xeon X7550 debuted at $1500. At current prices ($200 vs $1400), the Xeon E3-1285 v4 is $1200 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1285 v4 delivers 38.7 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon X7550 — making the Xeon E3-1285 v4 the 149.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1285 v4 | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $556-63% | $1500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-86% | $1400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.7+591% | 5.6 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1285 v4 and Xeon X7550
