Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon X7550

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon X7550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon X7550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1285 v4

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $944 less on MSRP ($556 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 165.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($556 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X7550 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,735 vs 7,873).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 18 MB).

Xeon X7550

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X7550 better than Xeon E3-1285 v4?

Yes. Xeon X7550 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X7550 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7550 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X7550 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1285 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon X7550 comes in 169.8% more expensive on MSRP at $1,500 MSRP versus $556 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1285 v4 is also 165.1% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 5.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1285 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Xeon X7550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1285 v4

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,735 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X7550

The Xeon X7550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 7,873 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X7550 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon X7550 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon X7550 — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is built on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1285 v4 scores 7,735 against the Xeon X7550's 7,873 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon X7550. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X7550.

Feature	Xeon E3-1285 v4	Xeon X7550
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+58%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+75%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	18 MB L3 Cache+200%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-DT (2015)	—
PassMark	7,735	7,873+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon X7550 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E3-1285 v4	Xeon X7550
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1567
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1285 v4) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X7550). Primary use case: Xeon X7550 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7550 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Xeon E3-1285 v4	Xeon X7550
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E3-1285 v4 was priced at $556, while the Xeon X7550 came in at $1500. On launch pricing ($556 vs $1500), Xeon E3-1285 v4 was $944 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1285 v4 delivers 13.9 pts/$ vs 5.2 pts/$ for the Xeon X7550 — making the Xeon E3-1285 v4 the 90.4% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E3-1285 v4	Xeon X7550
MSRP	$556-63%	$1500
Performance per Dollar	13.9+167%	5.2
Release Date	2015	2010

Search Xeon E3-1285 v4 on Amazon

Search Xeon X7550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.