Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Xeon E3-1285 v4

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE

4 / 8

7,787

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1285 v4

4 / 8

7,735

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Xeon E3-1285 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $387 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
✅Delivers 231.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.1 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $556 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Xeon E3-1285 v4

2015

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,735 vs 7,787).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($556 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE better than Xeon E3-1285 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1285 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE comes in $387 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $556 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 231.2% better value on MSRP (46.1 vs 13.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,787 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1285 v4

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,735 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Xeon E3-1285 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses Broadwell-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE scores 7,787 against the Xeon E3-1285 v4's 7,735 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE	Xeon E3-1285 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)	Broadwell-DT (2015)
PassMark	7,787	7,735

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE	Xeon E3-1285 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE was priced at $169, while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 came in at $556. On launch pricing ($169 vs $556), Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE was $387 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE delivers 46.1 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE the 107.2% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE	Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP	$169-70%	$556
Performance per Dollar	46.1+232%	13.9
Release Date	2018	2015

Search Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1285 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.