Opteron 6348 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6348 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6348 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6348

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($575 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $406 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
✅Delivers 237.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.1 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6348 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,787 vs 7,850).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6348, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6348 better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6348 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6348 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6348 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6348 is still the better call for a fresh build. Opteron 6348 comes in 240.2% more expensive on MSRP at $575 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,787 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6348 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6348

The Opteron 6348 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,850 points. Launch price was $800.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,787 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6348 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6348 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6348 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Opteron 6348 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6348 scores 7,850 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE's 7,787 — a 0.8% lead for the Opteron 6348. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6348 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+200%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	12 MB+2300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	7,850	7,787

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6348 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
Socket	G34	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6348 was priced at $575, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE came in at $169. On launch pricing ($575 vs $169), Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE was $406 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6348 delivers 13.7 pts/$ vs 46.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE the 108.6% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
MSRP	$575	$169-71%
Performance per Dollar	13.7	46.1+236%
Release Date	2012	2018

Search Opteron 6348 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.