Opteron 6348 vs Xeon X7350

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon X7350 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6348

12 / 12

7,850

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon X7350

6 / 6

7,836

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon X7350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon X7350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6348

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 115W instead of 130W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $575 MSRP, while Xeon X7350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X7350

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6348 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,836 vs 7,850).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6348 better than Xeon X7350?

Yes. Opteron 6348 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6348 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6348 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6348 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6348 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $575 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 6348 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon X7350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6348

The Opteron 6348 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,850 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X7350

The Xeon X7350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Tigerton (2007) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,836 points. Launch price was $2,301.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6348 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon X7350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Opteron 6348 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6348 versus 0.93 GHz on the Xeon X7350 — a 114.1% clock advantage for the Opteron 6348 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Opteron 6348 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X7350 uses Tigerton (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6348 scores 7,850 against the Xeon X7350's 7,836 — a 0.2% lead for the Opteron 6348. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6348 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X7350.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Xeon X7350
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+100%	6 / 6
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+266%	0.93 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.93 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	12 MB+200%	4 MB (total)
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Tigerton (2007)
PassMark	7,850	7,836

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6348 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X7350 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Xeon X7350
Socket	G34	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR2-667
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6348) / VT-x (Xeon X7350). Primary use case: Xeon X7350 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7350 rivals Core i3-2100.