Opteron 6348 vs Xeon X7550

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon X7550 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6348

12 / 12

7,850

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon X7550

7,873

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon X7550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon X7550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6348

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $925 less on MSRP ($575 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 160.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.7 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($575 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 115W instead of 130W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X7550 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,850 vs 7,873).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).

Xeon X7550

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X7550 better than Opteron 6348?

Yes. Xeon X7550 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X7550 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7550 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X7550 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6348 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon X7550 comes in 160.9% more expensive on MSRP at $1,500 MSRP versus $575 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6348 is also 160.1% better value on MSRP (13.7 vs 5.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 6348 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon X7550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6348

The Opteron 6348 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,850 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X7550

The Xeon X7550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 7,873 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6348 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon X7550 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6348 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6348 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon X7550 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Opteron 6348 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Opteron 6348 is built on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Opteron 6348 scores 7,850 against the Xeon X7550's 7,873 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon X7550. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6348 vs 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X7550.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Xeon X7550
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	18 MB L3 Cache+125%
L2 Cache	12 MB	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	—
PassMark	7,850	7,873

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6348 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X7550 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Xeon X7550
Socket	G34	LGA1567
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6348) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X7550). Primary use case: Xeon X7550 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7550 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Xeon X7550
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6348 was priced at $575, while the Xeon X7550 came in at $1500. On launch pricing ($575 vs $1500), Opteron 6348 was $925 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6348 delivers 13.7 pts/$ vs 5.2 pts/$ for the Xeon X7550 — making the Opteron 6348 the 88.9% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Xeon X7550
MSRP	$575-62%	$1500
Performance per Dollar	13.7+163%	5.2
Release Date	2012	2010

Search Opteron 6348 on Amazon

Search Xeon X7550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.