Opteron 6348 vs Ryzen 7 3750H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6348 vs Ryzen 7 3750H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6348 vs Ryzen 7 3750H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6348

2012

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,850 vs 7,990).
❌Launch MSRP is still $575 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 3750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 3750H

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6348, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3750H better than Opteron 6348?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6348 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3750H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3750H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3750H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3750H is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6348 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 3750H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $575 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6348 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3750H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6348 vs Ryzen 7 3750H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6348

The Opteron 6348 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,850 points. Launch price was $800.

Ryzen 7 3750H

The Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,990 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6348 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3750H offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6348 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6348 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3750H — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3750H (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Opteron 6348 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses Picasso (Zen+) (2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6348 scores 7,850 against the Ryzen 7 3750H's 7,990 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3750H. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6348 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3750H.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Ryzen 7 3750H
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+200%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+22%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	12 MB	512K (per core)+4167%
Process	32 nm	12 nm-63%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Picasso (Zen+) (2019)
PassMark	7,850	7,990+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6348 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.