Core i7-10810U vs Opteron 6348

Core i7-10810U vs Opteron 6348 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-10810U

6 / 12

7,987

+1.7%

7,850

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10810U vs Opteron 6348 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10810U vs Opteron 6348: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10810U

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 115W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6348, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.

Opteron 6348

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10810U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,850 vs 7,987).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $575 MSRP, while Core i7-10810U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌360% higher power demand at 115W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10810U better than Opteron 6348?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6348 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-10810U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10810U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10810U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10810U is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6348 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-10810U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $575 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6348 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-10810U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012), 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 12/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-10810U vs Opteron 6348 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10810U

The Core i7-10810U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,987 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 6348

The Opteron 6348 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,850 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-10810U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Opteron 6348 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6348 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10810U versus 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6348 — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-10810U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-10810U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6348 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10810U scores 7,987 against the Opteron 6348's 7,850 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i7-10810U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10810U vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6348.

Feature	Core i7-10810U	Opteron 6348
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 12+100%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+44%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.8 GHz+155%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+2033%	12 MB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark	7,987+2%	7,850

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10810U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6348 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.