
Core i5-10200H
Popular choices:

Opteron 6348
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10200H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Opteron 6348 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6348, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.
Opteron 6348
2012Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,850 vs 7,997).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $575 MSRP, while Core i5-10200H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10200H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-10200H
2020Opteron 6348
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Opteron 6348 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6348, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,850 vs 7,997).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $575 MSRP, while Core i5-10200H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10200H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10200H better than Opteron 6348?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10200H | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10200H | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10200H | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10200H | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10200H and Opteron 6348

Core i5-10200H
Core i5-10200H
The Core i5-10200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,997 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 6348
Opteron 6348
The Opteron 6348 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,850 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10200H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6348 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6348 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-10200H versus 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6348 — a 18.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10200H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-10200H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6348 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10200H scores 7,997 against the Opteron 6348's 7,850 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i5-10200H. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10200H vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6348.
| Feature | Core i5-10200H | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 12 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+21% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 12 MB+4700% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 7,997+2% | 7,850 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,372 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,392 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10200H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6348 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10200H | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-10200H) / not specified (Opteron 6348). The Core i5-10200H includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Opteron 6348 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-10200H | Opteron 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












