
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE

Xeon X7550
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Xeon X7550 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Xeon X7550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Xeon X7550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
2018Why buy it
- β Costs $1,331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- β Delivers 777.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.1 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X7550 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (7,787 vs 7,873).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 18 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X7550, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon X7550
2010Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- β271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon X7550 better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Xeon X7550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017β2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,787 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X7550
The Xeon X7550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 7,873 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X7550 offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Xeon X7550 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon X7550 β a 45.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is built on the Raven Ridge (2017β2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE scores 7,787 against the Xeon X7550's 7,873 β a 1.1% lead for the Xeon X7550. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X7550.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+60% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 18 MB L3 Cache+350% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | β |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge (2017β2019) | β |
| PassMark | 7,787 | 7,873+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7550 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1567 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR3-1333 |
| RAM Channels | β | 4 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X7550). Primary use case: Xeon X7550 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7550 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE was priced at $169, while the Xeon X7550 came in at $1500. On launch pricing ($169 vs $1500), Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE was $1331 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE delivers 46.1 pts/$ vs 5.2 pts/$ for the Xeon X7550 β making the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE the 159.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE | Xeon X7550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-89% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.1+787% | 5.2 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















