Opteron 6348 vs Xeon E3-1285 v4

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6348

12 / 12

7,850

+1.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1285 v4

4 / 8

7,735

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon E3-1285 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6348

2012

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌
3.4% HIGHER MSRP
$575 MSRPvs$556 MSRP
❌21.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 95W.

Xeon E3-1285 v4

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($556 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 115W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,735 vs 7,850).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1285 v4 better than Opteron 6348?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E3-1285 v4 is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6348 pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. Opteron 6348 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6348 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1285 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1285 v4 comes in $19 cheaper on MSRP at $556 MSRP versus $575 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Opteron 6348 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.5% better PassMark. It is also 1.9% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 13.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1285 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6348 vs Xeon E3-1285 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6348

The Opteron 6348 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,850 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E3-1285 v4

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,735 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6348 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6348 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6348 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v4 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Opteron 6348 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses Broadwell-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6348 scores 7,850 against the Xeon E3-1285 v4's 7,735 — a 1.5% lead for the Opteron 6348. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6348 vs 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285 v4.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Xeon E3-1285 v4
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+200%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	12 MB+4700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Broadwell-DT (2015)
PassMark	7,850+1%	7,735

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6348 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Xeon E3-1285 v4
Socket	G34	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6348 was priced at $575, while the Xeon E3-1285 v4 came in at $556. On launch pricing ($575 vs $556), Xeon E3-1285 v4 was $19 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6348 delivers 13.7 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1285 v4 — making the Xeon E3-1285 v4 the 1.9% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6348	Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP	$575	$556-3%
Performance per Dollar	13.7	13.9+1%
Release Date	2012	2015

Search Opteron 6348 on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1285 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.