Xeon E3-1290
VS
Core i5-4670

Xeon E3-1290 vs Core i5-4670

Intel

Xeon E3-1290

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i5-4670

4 Cores4 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1290 is positioned at rank 525 and the Core i5-4670 is on rank 666, so the Xeon E3-1290 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1290

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7655%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1445%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1284%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
992%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
98%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
98%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
97%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
97%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
96%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
95%
#525
Xeon E3-1290
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#535
Xeon E3-1241 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $27
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12091%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11425%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8296%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2499%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1980%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1732%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
992%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
979%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
891%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
891%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
881%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
857%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
846%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
842%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
834%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
99%
#665
Core i5-7400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $78
100%
#666
Core i5-4670
MSRP: $213|Avg: $65
100%
#667
Core i5-4570S
MSRP: $195|Avg: $40
100%
#668
Pentium G2010
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
#670
Core i5-6500TE
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
99%
#672
Core i5-4430
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
99%
#673
Celeron G550T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
99%
#674
Pentium G2130
MSRP: $75|Avg: $8
99%
#676
Core i7-6700K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $142
99%
#677
Core i5-4460S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $50
99%
#679
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
99%
#680
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1290 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E3-1290Core i5-4670
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($65)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4670 ($65), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($65 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E3-1290Core i5-4670
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($65)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1290 and Core i5-4670

Intel

Xeon E3-1290

The Xeon E3-1290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,429 points. Launch price was $885.

Intel

Core i5-4670

The Core i5-4670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,491 points. Launch price was $360.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1290 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-4670's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1290 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1290 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon E3-1290 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4670 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1290 scores 5,429 against the Core i5-4670's 5,491 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-4670. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1290 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670.

FeatureXeon E3-1290Core i5-4670
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+5%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+6%
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
5,429
5,491+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,169
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,279
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1290 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4670 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1290Core i5-4670
Socket
LGA1155
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1290) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670). The Core i5-4670 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E3-1290 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670 targets Mid-Range Desktop.

FeatureXeon E3-1290Core i5-4670
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mid-Range Desktop